Science 2.0: Redefining Science
Most scientists in this world define “science” as Materialism, Naturalism, Physicalism, Physical Reductionism, Darwinism, Nihilism, Behaviorism, Determinism, Classical Physics, Entropy, and Atheism. Such an act is called begging the question or jumping to conclusions, which is a logic fallacy.
Materialism, Physicalism, Darwinism, Behaviorism, and Determinism were carefully and purposefully designed to convince people that God and the Supernatural do not exist. They were designed to convince people that Action at a Distance or Quantum Mechanics does not exist. Materialism, Naturalism, and their derivatives were designed to exclude and eliminate any and all evidence demonstrating or proving that Psyche or Syntropy exists.
We’ll never be able to use Materialism and Naturalism to prove that God exists or to prove that Action at a Distance exists because these philosophical assumptions start with the pre-chosen conclusion that God, Psyche, Action at a Distance, and Quantum Mechanics do not exist.
I used to be a Materialist, Naturalist, Nihilist, and Atheist; so, I know of what I speak. I have been there and done that.
How we choose to define things makes all the difference in the world. As long as we continue to define “science” as Materialism and Naturalism, then Science’s most basic, most fundamental, and most essential questions will remain forever unanswered and unknown to us. It’s unavoidable.
Materialism, Naturalism, Behaviorism, and Determinism have NO scientific explanation for something as simple and basic as choice! They can’t explain choice, so they say that it does not exist. That’s what they do with everything that they can’t explain – they say that it doesn’t exist, sweep it under the rug, and pretend that it doesn’t exist. That’s what they tried to do with Quantum Mechanics. They can’t explain it, so they just ignore it. As long as we choose to define “science” as Materialism and Naturalism, then Science’s most basic concepts will remain unexplained and unexplainable.
However, if we choose to define “science” as Fine-Tuning, then instantly we have thousands (if not millions) of different Scientific Proofs of God’s Existence suddenly spring forth before our eyes as if from nowhere. I KNOW because I have done that as well. Science IS Fine-Tuning; and, Fine-Tuning is an infinitely better definition for Science than Materialism, Naturalism, Darwinism, and Atheism. Whenever we do Science, we are in fact doing Fine-Tuning of some sort, are we not?
How we choose to define things makes all the difference in the universe.
When we choose to define “science” as Fine-Tuning, Science’s explanatory power literally goes through the roof! The same thing happens when we choose to define “science” as Quantum Mechanics, Action at a Distance, Intelligence, Psyche, and Syntropy. Instantly, we can explain EVERYTHING that comes our way. Suddenly, nothing is beyond our reach.
Mark My Words